Canada Is Paying to Burn Its Own Forests — And Then Blaming You
In the Maritimes alone, glyphosate spraying on Crown land has become an annual ritual. In New Brunswick, roughly 15,000 hectares of public forest are sprayed every year, with a 30% increase since 2005
Across this country, from the Atlantic to the Pacific, our governments are quietly turning public forests into firetraps — at your expense — and then weaponizing the resulting chaos to strip away freedoms in the name of “climate emergencies.” They call it vegetation management. The rest of us call it what it is: state-funded ecocide.
In the Maritimes alone, glyphosate spraying on Crown land has become an annual ritual. In New Brunswick, roughly 15,000 hectares of public forest are sprayed every year, with a 30 % increase since 2005. That’s not “sustainable forestry” — that’s an industrial kill operation. In 2017, taxpayers forked out $2.86 million to poison their own land. Nova Scotia claims to have ended Crown land spraying in 2010, but still greenlights massive herbicide programs on private industrial lands feeding into the same mills. And it’s not just here — British Columbia, Quebec, Ontario — every province with a forestry sector has dabbled in this scorched-earth policy.
Glyphosate doesn’t politely “target competing species.” It wipes out anything green, stripping biodiversity from the forest floor to the canopy. That means destroying food sources for moose, deer, and countless smaller species, creating monocultures of fast-growing, low-diversity softwood, and leaving dead, dried biomass littered across thousands of hectares — perfect fuel for wildfire ignition. In Ontario, First Nations have been shown maps of “where your lands will be poisoned” — with no consultation. In the Maritimes, scientists have documented long-term degradation of forest ecosystems, a slow bleed of resilience disguised as “management.”
Here’s the part they don’t want you thinking about: herbicide spraying kills vegetation, the deadfall dries out over months and years, you now have a tinderbox stretching for miles, and when it burns, they call it a “climate emergency.” This is cause and effect so obvious a child could see it — yet the state acts like wildfires are a freak accident of weather.
Fast-forward to Maritime Canada, August 2025: fires rage, smoke smothers towns, the government declares climate-emergency restrictions, forest access is closed, trails are barred, and fines are threatened for stepping foot on what is supposedly your land. The real arsonist? Policy. Not lightning, not campers, not some angry sky god — government policy. But the punishment falls on you, while the cause remains funded and protected.
And here’s where it gets truly unconstitutional. Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees mobility rights — the right to move freely within the country — and freedom of peaceful assembly. Banning people from so-called “public” land is a direct infringement. For Indigenous peoples, it’s even more egregious: Crown land closures violate Treaty rights and Aboriginal rights under Section 35 of the Constitution. The treaties didn’t expire because of a forest fire. The right to hunt, fish, and gather on traditional territories exists whether the government’s on a “climate lockdown” kick or not.
So the obvious question is — are Indigenous people still allowed into these closed areas when the bans are in place? By Treaty, the answer is yes. This creates yet another two-tier system, and while this is happening, the rhetoric ramps up coast to coast. Public frustration over land closures, combined with government-driven propaganda, is being twisted into a “Whites vs Indians” narrative. It’s a distraction from the real culprits — the policy-makers, corporate forestry interests, and bureaucrats who engineered this mess. Instead of seeing the shared loss of public access, people are pushed into resenting one another. Every new closure, every high-profile enforcement incident, moves “reconciliation” closer to its breaking point.
Follow the money. Glyphosate spraying feeds industrial forestry’s need for cheap, uniform, fast-growing conifers. The public bankrolls it, industry profits, and the state gets the perfect pretext to expand emergency powers when it all goes up in smoke. You pay for the poison. You pay for the fire suppression. You pay the fine if you cross the yellow tape. The forest? That’s just collateral.
This is not mismanagement. This is deliberate. We are watching a country where public land is weaponized against the public, where Treaty rights are trampled under a chemical boot, and where every “emergency” becomes an excuse to push the walls in a little closer. If you think this all ends with “just stay off the trails for a while,” you haven’t been paying attention for the last 5 years…
Darren Grimes




Glyphosate is a desiccant which will dry out what it is sprayed on - hence it is used on hay and other crops before harvesting. It will therefore dry out forests turning them into tinder boxes as well as poisoning them. Governments are overstepping their rights as well neglecting their responsibilities and not acting in the interests of Canadian people or wildlife at all.
The morons will just do elbows up chicken dance and everything will be nice and peachy, problem solved